Crucially, through such mapping exercise, the scientists were able to reveal several noise hotspots overlapping with areas that are of particular importance to noise-susceptible marine mammal species, and/or areas that are already declared protected areas. Such important cetacean habitats include the Pelagos Marine Mammal Sanctuary in the Ligurian Sea, the Strait of Sicily, and parts of the Hellenic Trench, as well as waters between the Balearic Islands and continental Spain where noise-producing activities accumulate, according to the report. The risk for the marine animals in such areas is thus high, as they are exposed to cumulative and synergistic noise, and hence, extensive sources of stress.
Such threat has also been recognised by the Spanish Government. Their Ministry of the Environment recently announced that the waters between the Balearic Islands and the Spanish mainland will be designated a protected migration corridor for whales and dolphins, which will also result in strict management measures for noise producing activities.
“This report is the first basis for a purposeful development of noise reducing measures. It substantiates the urgent need for action to establish a transparent data register on anthropogenic noise sources in the Mediterranean and to take measures to reduce the problem”, says Silvia Frey, PhD, co-author of the report and director for science and education at OceanCare. Implementing such a register is also part of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive’s current action plan.
"With this report, we stand at the beginning of an acoustic assessment of the Mediterranean Sea as a marine habitat. Thus far, only noise sources which are timely and spatially incomplete could be identified. Hence, there is further need for scientific investigations into noise levels within the Mediterranean and, moreover, into what can be assessed as an acceptable and safe noise limit. Nevertheless, this first glance is remarkable and the extent of the noise sources is worrisome", explains Frey.
“The present mapping also reveals data weaknesses, as we have to assume that some areas currently identified as ‘quiet’, particularly along the coastline of Northern Africa, are only considered quiet due to a lack of data. In particular, activities by oil and gas companies, as well as the military remain largely obscure", adds Nicolas Entrup, consultant on underwater noise pollution for OceanCare and for US-based organisation NRDC.
“For the first time we have a wide spatial and temporal vision of the multiple and often overlapping human activities that produce noise underwater and that may have synergistic and cumulative effects on marine life. We now need models to map sound levels and sound exposure. We should not forget that conservation also means ‘conserving the acoustic quality of the habitats’”, says Gianni Pavan, co-author of the report and professor of the University of Pavia, Italy.
“Human activities using loud noise sources appear to cover very big portions of the Mediterranean Sea, and, of course, their impacts on marine wildlife propagate, regardless of human boundaries. Although far from being exhaustive, results shown in this study point out the need of a regulatory framework which takes into account the transboundary effects of man-made noise on the marine environment”, Alessio Maglio, co-author and scientist at SINAY SAS, adds.
Manuel Castellote, PhD, co-author and scientist at NOAA, concludes: “With this report we have barely grasped the tip of the iceberg when it comes to underwater noise occurrence in the Mediterranean Sea. A major concern is the amount of silent Mediterranean countries, silent when it comes to information sharing, not underwater silence!”
The report was commissioned by the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area (ACCOBAMS) in order to identify areas of concern, to propose the need for further scientific assessment, as well as to deduce appropriate conservation measures.
The authors of the report are:
- Alessio Maglio, responsible for marine environmental assessments, SINAY SAS, environmental consulting, France
- Gianni Pavan, professor for terrestrial and marine bioacoustics, CIBRA-DSTA, University of Pavia, Italy
- Manuel Castellote, PhD, scientist at the Cetacean Assessment & Ecology Program at the National Marine Mammal Laboratory of NOAA – National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA
- Silvia Frey, PhD, director science and education, OceanCare, Switzerland
The figure shows where and how many of the four anthropogenic noise sources, namely ports and marinas, industrial projects (including oil and gas production facilities, wind turbines), commercial and scientific seismic exploration and military exercises occur. Areas with a higher number of noise-producing sources can be described as noise hotspots.
Further explanation for Figure 10 (p. 29 - see above): Noise-cetacean interaction hotspots: overlap of noise hotspots and important cetacean habitats
The illustration shows the areas with noise-producing human activities superimposed over the layer of important cetacean habitats as adopted by the Parties to the Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans in the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area (ACCOBAMS) in 2010. It yields important information of areas where potential conflicts between human activities and cetacean conservation may occur with reference to underwater noise pollution. Areas with no displayed noise sources, however, should not be interpreted as quiet or noise safe zones, because ship traffic as an important sound source is not depicted. Furthermore, it should be noted that the collated number of noise sources is not completely representative of the spatial and temporal noise situation due to a lack of a central database of noise-producing human activities, missing transparency regarding the implementation of seismic explorations, a deficiency of readiness to provide information of certain stakeholders and the security/secrecy aspects of military activities.